Preposterous Mumble Jumble

Keepin' them real: the media and politics

University Newspaper: The Center of Attention

A newspaper usually makes others the center of critical attention. But what happens when the newspaper itself becomes the focus of a media controversy?

On March 28, all eyes were on the Daily Texan— the student newspaper of the University of Texas. The Opinion page featured a cartoon showing a white mother reading to her child, "And then ... the big bad white man killed the handsome, sweet, innocent colored boy," from a book visibly titled "Treyvon (sic) Martin and the case of yellow journalism.”

Trayvon Martin was a 17-year-old teenager from Sanford, Fla., killed last month allegedly by Geroge Zimmerman— a neighborhood watch volunteer who claims the shooting was in self-defense.

The political cartoon quickly received national attention that day. As I sat in the basement of William Randolph Hearst Building that day, I could feel the tension mounting in the newsroom.

The door that connects the Texan to the outside world kept opening and closing. Reporters, photographers and editors flocked in every now and then and whisper, "It's blowing up. It's everywhere." Someone said the Gawker is reporting on the cartoon. Then, Huffington Post picked it up. The news about the editorial cartoon had gone viral in a matter of few hours. The Texan staff was left to deal with a huge media blunder.

The Texan's editor-in-chief Vivana Aldous said when her and the other four members of the editorial board had a discussion about running the cartoon the day before, they were not expecting this reaction at all.

"We saw the cartoon that ran Tuesday and did not agree with it," Aldous says.

She hesitates about giving full-length quotes. In fact, she says she does not want to be quoted if she can help it. Viviana is applying for law school this summer.

"This is going to come up when people google me," Aldous whispers to her colleagues.

Aldous was not the cartoonist, but somehow people found her Facebook picture and posted it in their tweets on Twitter. The Daily Texan received about two or three tweets per minute that day. Most of the people expressed grave disappointment at the Texan’s staff for running the cartoon.

Quickly, Aldous asked Stephanie Eisner— the author of the illustration and  political cartoonist for the Texan's editorial board— to take her information off the University's directory. She asks Eisner to also make her Facebook page private.

This is bad, managing editor Audrey White kept saying to herself. She was standing a few feet away from me, talking to the Texan's advisor Doug Warren. They talked about a possible reaction story for tomorrow's paper, but everyone was occupied. They turned around and saw me looking at them.

"Huma! You want to do a story?," White asks me.

I was at the Texan that day to do a feature on how students manage to produce a daily newspaper despite hectic schedules. I got drafted to do a story for them instead.

I spoke to Aldous and then I spoke to Eisner. Both seemed frazzled. Eisner told me she doesn't feel apologetic, but she knows she didn't get the message across successfully. She said her cartoon was a comment on how the media is portraying the coverage of this case.

"I feel the news should be unbiased. And in the retelling of this particular event, I felt that that was not the case,” Eisner said. “My story compared this situation to yellow journalism in the past, where aspects of news stories were blown out of proportion with the intention of selling papers and enticing emotions.”

As I wrapped up my conversation with Eisner, I started looking up black student organizations on campus. Stephanie gave me an apologetic look. She knew I would be talking to some angry students. I assured her I will be fine and that this is part of my job. A learning experience, as Warren says later when I speak to him in his small office in the same basement.

Warren has been the Texan's adviser since 2010. He worked at the Boston Globe for 21 years before moving to Texas. He has been around these types of situations many times before.

"In my professional career, we were frequently and never willingly at the center of media's attention," Warren says.

He recalls the Globe's coverage of a couple’s murder in New Hampshire in 1998. Two people had died. In the story, the Globe reporter wrote that the man killed was having an affair and police was looking into whether that was part of the reason why someone might have murdered him. That day, Warren said he got a phone call from the man's daughter. She asked him how they could publish a story like that. She affirmed that it's a lie and that her father was not having an affair. Later, the rumored affair turns out to be false.

Warren turned his face away from me for a few seconds while retelling me this. When he turned back, his face had changed.

"Even now it chokes me up.  What am I supposed to say to that person?," he said. "She just lost both her parents and it's almost like we killed them again."

He said journalists have to realize that there are lives being impacted by what a paper publishes. Warren said that he will go down with the ship defending the Texan's rights to publish, he can put himself in people's shoes to see how they are affected by what's in the paper.

Nevertheless, he says being in a media controversy is always a valuable experience.

Many who gathered at a "Justice for Trayvon" rally that evening at the Texas capitol saw the cartoon as racist. They handed out copies of the paper saying it is a prime example of racial bias in the media. Andrew Messamore, a general reporter for the Texan who was covering the rally, relayed to us what happened. White and Warren shook their heads as they listened.

This is bad, but they will pull themselves out of it. In a few weeks, people will probably cease to talk about it.

Regardless, it was a long night at the Daily Texan. The day slowly merged into night. When I left the basement late into the night, I saw many staff members perched at their stations, working to churn out the next day's paper. The next day’s paper contained many guest editorials regarding the cartoon-- disapproving of the way editorial board handled the situation. About 40 students gathered outside the Texan’s building to demand an apology. Eisner, who said she won’t apologize, did. She also stepped down. The editorial board apologized.

As I sat in the KUT radio newsroom the next day for my internship, I kept hearing Your News Network playing the Texan’s cartoon clip over and over again on T.V. Someone finally turned down the volume, but I could hear it in my mind on repeat: “The Daily Texan wins Gawker’s most racist Trayvon Martin’s cartoon contest.”

 

Mojo journalism

Normal.dotm 0 0 1 353 2013 University of Texas 16 4 2472 12.0 0 false 18 pt 18 pt 0 0 false false false

It is amazing how many people are striving to be “mojo” journalists these days. These journalists are not just carrying a recorder these days. Rather, they are shooting videos and learning how to code. It enables them to report for several different mediums.

 

These mediums include broadcast, radio and most importantly, the web. I say the web is more important because that’s where you have the greatest chance of interaction with your audience. Everyone is immersed in the world of Internet today and that’s where most people get their news. This is why it’s become important for journalists to know how to shoot and edit videos, audio and make info graphics that are appealing to the eyes.

 

People who lack these skills are probably not ready to market themselves for jobs. And that’s the scary part that every journalism student must realize before they leave college.

 

From the readings this week, there was a special emphasis on learning to do different types of things in order to land a good journalism job. There seemed to be an argument, however. Is the new “mojo” journalism getting in the way of reporters who need sufficient time to produce good stories? Is their attention wavering by constantly juggling several balls at once? Is this hindering the quality of journalism? From the readings, people seemed to have two different ideas. One was that multimedia journalism is significant but quality reporting is also needed.

 

And then there were some who took the middle road and said you should be able to do both. I agree with this. I especially liked an article by Robert Niles from the readings that talked about becoming an expert in almost everything possible. This is what journalism is.  You don’t know what you’re going to cover next and every day opens possibilities to learn something new. I think traditional journalism is also important because we have so many issues affecting people today. We need to be honest about shedding light on what’s important. But the reality is that we must also sharpen our skills and venture out of our comfort zones to be where we want to be.

 

The newsroom is more than just reporting on an issue now. It’s about photos, videos, audios, graphs and everything that can simplify and break down information. Our new generation is not accustomed to looking at old newspapers with plain writing. They want something new and fresh and we should be willing to provide them with that. 

Future of print journalism

In my short college life, I have attended dozens of lectures on the future of journalism.

These lectures were delivered by some of the most prestigious journalism personalities in our country such as Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. They all addressed the same question: Is there a way to save the sinking ship of journalism?

The answers and solutions they provided varied. 

However, it is still far from clear where journalism is headed and nobody has a concrete solution yet. This is what I learned from this week's readings. Many of the links tried to address this issue but the ideas and solutions are vague. It's not anyone's fault. Rather, it simply cannot be helped.

Internet has revolutionized this world and journalism is but a small part of this great metamorphosis.

I am not writing this post because I have a solution. Truth is, I don't but I am hopeful. I am serious about journalism and someday I will get there. How? When? Where would it be? I am not sure but I know people will always need quality news and someone will always strive to expose the entire truth. 

I hope that someone is me. 

 

 

 

 

Why do people think Obama is a Muslim? Because Journalism is Failing and so are its Pupils.

Hahhaha

 

It is rather funny when you walk into a presentation on the perilous state of Journalism as a profession and you find out that those presenting and listening are equally ill-informed and incoherently stupid.

 

The incompetency of these people showed through the questions being asked by the instructor and the responses of the general mass of audience.

 

In a "Critical Issues in Journalism" class at UT, over a 100 students were attending their 2nd lecture of the semester. The professor had a polished presentation on the projector as we took our seats in a big lecture hall, cramming together in seats that squeaked as we moved around impatiently for the class to begin.

 

It was a lecture I was throughly looking forward to. Finally, oh finally, a professor with a prestigious background in the field was going to shed some light on the issues in Journalism. But to my great disappointment, I was thoroughly unamused and rather frustrated. 

 

In the first half he went over statistics that showed the declining number of news readers in the country from 1990s to 2000s. In between he would ask interesting questions that provoked some insightfulness in all of us. I raised my hand every time but was only picked on once. I can understand that because it is a large classroom and the professor was only trying to be fair.

 

The professor posed two questions that I particularly remember and the response to these was alarmingly shameful and disheartening. "Why is there a decline in the news "believability?" asked the professor and several people answered it was because people are prone to seek out modern mediums of news rather than traditional. Some said it was because news was boring. Others believed that people of this  generation gave less preference to what was going on around them. All of these comments were correct but completely irrelevant to the question. 

 

Finally, someone said the word "biased" and myself and the girl sitting next to me sighed a breath of relief! Someone has caught on. Bias is indeed the major cause of news readership decline in America. People are simply turned off by the current trend of news media projecting only one side of the story. 

 

There was another question posed to the class and the response was even more horrid than before. It is that question and the answers that accumulated thereof, which inspired me to write this blatant piece of rant. 

 

"Why do more and more people believe that Obama is a Muslim?"

 

My hand shot up as the answer was dancing upon my lips. Alas, the professor picked students who hadn't answered before. The response varied. Some said it was because of his name "Barack Hussien Obama," and some believed it was because people were racist and wanted to kick the good guy out. All of these were correct but missed a crucial point: Barack Obama is the only president to have extended the greetings of peace to the Islamic world in decades. 

 

Naurose, a holiday celebrated in Iran, came at a time this year when the country was in the midst of great political and controversial debate over its nuclear policy. Obama wished the people of Iran a happy holiday and expressed that American people only wanted peace. 

 

Ground Zero mosque has stirred great hostility against Muslims in America. People on the left and right were opposed of building a mosque located only a few miles away from Ground Zero, a place that suffered a great tragedy on September 11th, 2001.

 

Obama came out and said Muslims have the right to worship just as freely as any Christian, Jew, Hindu, etc. And by that he meant they also had a right to build places of worship. 

 

Not one person brought up these facts in class.

 

The fact that people believe Obama is a Muslim is not because he is a Muslim. It is simply because he has tried to bridge a gap between two worlds: The Western and the Islamic. For this reason and this reason alone, people have distorted his speeches and manipulated his words to suit their own biases. This is the real reason why people believe he is a Muslim. Of course his background had much to do with it, too but it was less of an issue after the election. After all, the majority voted for him, no?

 

The question was not properly answered by either the students or the professor. The girl sitting next to me had her hand up and I whispered to her what I thought was the best response and she shook her head in agreement and said, "Nobody is bringing up the Ground Zero mosque." 

 

The reason why people believe all these peculiar assumptions is because they don't take the time to inform themselves properly. They are living like illiterates in a literate society--a society with abundance of information available for its citizens. 

 

The students in my class are a living testimony of why this profession is in a perilous state. If the current generation is to enter in this profession and take over, what hope is there to save it from disaster? Unless students of journalism start reading the news and learn to distinguish between facts and garbage, we are all doomed. 

 

I hope my message doesn't come across as cynicism. These are all true observations and I hope more students start reading the news and become more informed. 

Reaching the stars

Comet

Many years ago, when I was only a little child, I remember having a dream.

I was standing on the roof of my apartment in Islamabad (Pakistan) and was gazing toward the sky. 

I saw millions of stars grouped together like clusters and three bright stars which stood out among them. I remember seeing a comet shooting across the sky with its magnificent tail. 

The dream was not recurring but it left a deep impression on my heart.

In summer, the weather would get unbearably hot in Islamabad. We would put our mattresses out in the open roof under the sky and talk about stars and celestial bodies all night long. Sometimes, we would even see shooting stars. I was so intrigued by the universe and the world outside of our planet that I became more inquisitive as the time passed.

That life can exist in such a beautiful way, almost took my breath away. 

This was the first time I realized that life is meant for greater things. 

I started praying. I prayed with all my heart. 

With fewer resources available in Pakistan, I knew my chances of studying astronomy were minimal. I would often quarrel with my cousins on this topic. They would say, "You should give up and probably go for computer science or become a doctor."

Still, I didn't give up. The impression of those starry nights under the sky had stirred something deep inside me.

When I came to the United States in 2001, I was sure that my dream of studying astronomy would come true. In 9th grade however, I learned that math was not my greatest strength. I developed an interest and writing and reading literature. I also became more involved in global conflicts and constantly updated myself on current events.

This is why I chose Journalism in college. My dream of studying astronomy faded a little in high school years but emerged again when I enrolled into an astronomy course in college. That's when I learned that I never stopped loving this subject even for a second.

As a matter of fact, immersing myself in astronomy gave me more pleasure than writing. It always enlightened me in a way that cannot be expressed through words. I just felt like I belonged to something greater than myself. 

I am taking another course in Astronomy this coming Fall. Living here for so long, I am often reminded of that dream and long discussions with my father that first developed my interest in this great subject....

And today...I have the opportunity to study it as much as possible. Not even just Astronomy but I am able to gain as much knowledge as I want in any subject of my choice. 

For this, I am nothing but grateful to God and my father. All my desires have come true. Power of prayer certainly precedes everything else in life. 

I hope anyone who aspires to be anyone is met with the same result. But you have to remember that prayer and having a goal achieves everything in life. If you separate the two, it doesn't work. 

Posted July 23, 2010

When do Comedians REALLY cross the line?

Borat

In Latino Images and Hollywood Paradigm, we come across different perspectives every week as controversial topics pertaining to race and ethnicity are addressed.

 

Today, what provoked my interest the most was “comedy” in the United States. We were discussing how some comedians cross the line by attacking sacred or personal values of people from different cultures and religions. Class was somewhat divided as to which side they agreed upon. Some people said that you are always going to offend someone and part of being a comedian is that you DO offend people. That’s apparently how they make their money. However, it got me thinking: when does a comedian really crosses the line?

 

Well, in my opinion, a comedian crosses the line when he or she starts over generalizing and portraying an image that distorts the reality. Every thing has a basis. Even good jokes stem from factual information. However, when you have no basis for a joke, you start to go off tangent and reality is often misrepresented.

 

In the case of Swedish cartoons, that is exactly what happened. For those of you who do not remember this incident, it’s about a Danish cartoonist who drew pictures of prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and depicted him as a terrorist in many of the cartoons. The Muslims all around the world were shocked and protested violently. I don’t agree that we should kill the guy for doing this but I do think that he crossed a line between distortion and genuine comedy (or journalism for that matter). That is not to say that he should be punished for it but he should be mindful that there are some things that are very sacred to some cultures and religions. You cannot bash them and then not expect a response.

 

However, there is another point that I want to make. The basis of Danish cartoons was simply the misrepresentative image of Islam in the media. Unfortunately, the author didn’t do any research about the life of Prophet (peace be upon him) himself before drawing the cartoons. How can I say this? Well, it clearly shows from one of his photos where he drew the prophet’s face with a bomb on his head. This is a prophet who spoke in his last sermon and said that everyone is created equal. That no man shall have any superiority over another. White has no supremacy over black and black has no authority over white. These are the teachings he left for his people before his demise. This is the same prophet that was depicted as a terrorist in the newspapers of Denmark. I ask the cartoonist: Do you know what you based your cartoons on? Or did you simply succumb to the distorted image of Islam shown by the contemporary media?

 

By doing so, he not only offended a great mass of people but also put a stain on the field of journalism itself. Journalism isn’t about distortion or taking things for the face value. You have to do research before you put something out there. And if you fail to do so, you face dire consequences. I know because I have seen it happen at local and global levels. It’s unfortunate but it is the root cause why people are losing credibility in the major news sources today. But that’s a topic for another time….

Posted April 5, 2010

Evict Palestinians to make room for Jewish Settlements

Israel

I came across this article today and it made my blood boil. It motivated me to say a few words as I have been inactive for the past few days. 

The article talks about building more Jewish settlements along East Jerusalem. This action is proving to be nothing but "detrimental" to the peace efforts. 

United States' top aides to the President Obama have rebuked this idea and are fiercely opposed to it. For the first time in my life, I am proud to be an American. 

The article talks about the eviction of 18 Palestinian families by Israel to make more room for Jewish settlements in the area. Israel thinks it is perfectly okay to kick people out of their homes to make room for its own community. 

In my opinion, they have no conscious. They have no sympathy in their hearts. Their religion proclaims them to be the "chosen" people and therefore it makes it right for them to do "wrong" to whomsoever they want. 

Well, to hell with that kind of propriety and arrogance. I am glad that the United States is finally standing up for people in Palestine. It is unfortunate to see the Palestinians suffering for this long when we live in a world of experiences and brutal life lessons learned from WWI and WWII. 

"Never again..." was the promise after holocaust. Well that promise is broken again and again with Palestine, Darfur, Rowanda, Kashmir and the list goes on...

It's a sad world that we live in and we should be ashamed. 

Fight for Oil and Sovereignty: Falkland Islands

Sinking

 Couple of days ago, I came across a beautiful picture of Falkland Islands.
Falkland Islands have been long claimed by Argentina as their territory. The islands are not only beautiful but also contain reservoirs of black gold (oil).
 
Obviously this perks the interest of oil companies around the world and especially those owned by Britain. Thus, they have begun drilling in the waters for this God-forsaken substance that has been a root cause of many, many conflicts around the world.
 
Argentina is going to make an appeal to UN about the matter next week. However, Britain has assured Argentina that they have no interest in the islands themselves save for potential reservoir of black gold.
 
In my opinion, Britain needs to get the eff out of Falkland Islands. They have no right to dig for oil in Argentinian waters.
 
This expansion through the means of oil is getting ridiculous as the time goes on. This is the face of new imperialism where third world countries are exploited of their natural resources by wealthy nations. This is the face that must be unvieled soon. This is the face that is responsible for the global economical, ecological and social problems.
 
Here is an article you can read about this issue. I would also recommend reading "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins.

Health Care Bill too "short" for some

Political-hurdle-health-care-r

LOL This guy is rather hilarious!
 
It's a shot article. Don't hesitate to give it a read.
 
Basically, it's another jerk complaining about the health bill being too "short". This bill was proposed a few days ago and I am ashamed to say that I have yet to read up on it.
 
Why don't you and I read it together? Then if you have any comments, feel free to share. Let's have a good discussion!

Sci-fi movies that put science to shame!

Famousmonsters

LOL. Sorry, I know it is a very unprofessional way of starting a blog (referring to my "lol" in the beginning) but I came across this article  and I just had to laugh!
 
Poor scientists. The article is basically about Hollywood creating movies that have some relation to science on the surface but lack serious thought and research behind some of the stuff they show.
 
Some of the movies completely refute the scientific theories.
 
Some would say that this is why they are called "movies" but I agree with the scientists. No matter what, I will always agree with science. It's the most logical thing to do.
 
God bless my dad who has been complaining about the same thing as the scientists for a couple of years now. He says that movies in Hollywood portray unrealistic view of science which therefore creates expectations that can never be met in real life.
 
It's just funny because nobody has raised this issue before and I am happy to see that scientists are finally taking a stand to preserve the integrity of science.  
 
Don't forget to read the article.